Will the Trump Administration actually step in to push back against fines leveled at U.S. tech companies in other regions?
Trump’s team has repeatedly criticized foreign penalties being imposed on the tech giants, and recently threatened to halt all trade discussions with Canadian officials over the implementation of Canada’s “Digital Services Tax.” That forced Canada to back down, and now, Meta and others are hoping that the White House will apply the same approach in other cases where they’re facing significant, targeted penalties in foreign nations.
Because those penalties are mounting, and with platforms like X already struggling to reach profitability, they can’t keep taking massive hits on this front.
Indeed, X has today announced that it will not adhere to the French government’s “politically-motivated” investigation into the platform over alleged manipulation of its algorithm and data extraction.
X has vowed to oppose this push, rather than eat any penalties as a result, adding to the growing list of tech platforms looking to push back on such rulings.
At the same time, Meta, X and LinkedIn have also lodged a combined appeal against the latest VAT claim by Italian authorities, which would force each of them to pay millions in local tax.
Italy’s value added tax (VAT) is applied to all goods and services exchanged in the nation, and Italian tax authorities are now looking to charge social platforms based on user registrations as “taxable transactions” in this respect.
If this is allowed to go ahead, Meta will be facing $US961 in fines, LinkedIn is set to be hit with a $US163.6 bill, while X would be forced to pay $US14.6m.
All three platforms have opposed the charges, and are now looking to take stronger legal action to avoid the penalties, with, again, the hopes that the Trump Administration will back them, when push comes to shove.
Because as noted, Trump’s team has indicated that they will fight for U.S. companies in this respect.
Earlier in the year, the Trump-appointed chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) publicly criticized the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), which he says is “incompatible with America’s free speech tradition.” Vice President JD Vance has also criticized EU regulations relating to AI innovation, while Trump himself has also threatened European imports with tariffs, in penalty for tech regulations that harm U.S. companies.
But they haven’t actually taken action against EU regulators as yet.
Which would be a big step, and one that the White House is likely keen to avoid, but with Meta re-aligning its moderation approach around the Trump administration’s preferences, and all the tech giants looking to support Trump, in exchange for his favor, it does seem like this could soon lead to a bigger impasse in foreign negotiations.
And Meta, it’s worth noting, has the most to lose.
Over the last few years, Meta has been fined over a billion dollars per year by EU authorities, with penalties related to data breaches, the linking of Facebook Marketplace to Facebook, illegally forcing users to accept personalized ads, and more. The combined impact, then, is significant, and with this in mind, it’s a lot clearer as to why Zuckerberg has been so keen to support the second Trump Administration, with a view to pushing back on EU rule makers.
Will this come to a head, and see the Trump team impose new restrictions on EU trade as a result?
It seems that Trump may have to follow through, with the tech giants now looking to draw a line in the sand, in order to force a confrontation.
